Value Management at Construction Industry
Value can be considered as an especially direct suspected – the extent between the benefit got from a technique and the cost or effort expected to achieve it. This contemplation is comprehensive, but it will in general be seen clearly to the extent plan and advancement decisions both gigantic and little. According to Tanko et.al.,( 2018), Value can be an incredibly wide plan to apply to an assignment, yet the going with express models help with showing the idea:
• obliteration and redoing of a midtown region business environment tends to worth to the architect expecting the extended rents to be gained from the new construction offset the costs of plan and advancement and the inadequacy of existing rent during redevelopment
• decision of an all the more exorbitant yet more energy useful design organizations system, for example for warming or lighting, addresses worth to the client in the event that the net present worth of the useful saving balances the extra frank cost
• as a rule worth may be reduced in the event that a central format restricts the size of – and along these lines the crude parts used in – every column and fragment, but requires significantly more obfuscated affiliations and site the board that development foundation costs
• worth may be diminished in the event that a foreordained thing of plant is subbed by a more affordable indistinguishable that has a more restricted future. The last two models in the above list diagram how worth to the overall endeavor may be not as old as worth saw by individual people from the endeavor bunch. The basic fashioner may see materials costs diminished by an even more essentially powerful arrangement, for instance, but the task laborer or fabricator will see the additional cost of the jumbled affiliations these include. Also, an undertaking specialist may see the cost saving from purchasing a more affordable piece of equipment, but the construction owner will see higher practical costs coming about on account of more nonstop replacement. One of the critical hardships in regard the leaders and worth planning is to understand the extent of impacts that a particular decision may have, including their financial consequences.
Regard planning (VE), at first known as worth assessment, made in the USA during the 1940s and 1950s while creating materials were difficult to find in the consequence of the Second World War. This incited the prospect of elective materials and plans to achieve a comparative outcome, an enormous number of which were then found to perform better at lower cost (Oke and Ahimien, 2017).
The articulation used at the time was: ‘on the off chance that we can’t get the material then we ought to get the limit.’ This encouraged task gatherings to appear at particular game plans while focusing in on the fundamental necessities. In the UK, regard the leaders (VM) made during the 1980s and 1990s as a more broad cooperation to explore how worth could be obliged an endeavor at a fundamental level by helping with cultivating the right endeavor brief.
Used enough, it can diminish plan and improvement time by giving the gathering an all the more clear focus on the client’s need necessities (Ojo and Ogensuni, 2018). In customary use, the terms regard the chiefs and worth planning will for the most part be compatible, but toward this path note the separation between fundamental worth organization and key worth planning will be stayed aware of where appropriate. Regardless this, both VM and VE ask the endeavor gathering to reexamine the speculations that are made during arrangement and advancement searching for more costeffective strategies for achieving the best outcomes. There are opportunities to apply VM and VE all through the arrangement and advancement process. The benefit to be gotten from doing VM and VE studies, in any case, lessens as the errand propels. Figure 1 shows the general instance of growing expense and lessening impact from introducing change as an endeavor progresses. In the UK, it is generally recognized that VM occurs during the past periods of an endeavor and that, when plans and subtleties have been made, a comparable cooperation becomes VE.
All things being equal, the terms will as a rule get used alternately and the assessor should be prepared for this. It is basic to get what they share for all aims and reason – a consideration on clearing out futile cost from the endeavor or asset, or from systems, parts or cycles related with it, to chip away at the extent among aids and costs (Ncube and Rwelamila, 2017). It will in general be battled that this ought to at this point be fundamental for the assessor’s standard work. The action isn’t connected to wiping out crucial cost from an endeavor by lessening its augmentation, barring work things or scaling down the specific underneath the level of execution required by the client. VM and VE should be utilized to immediate and facilitate adventure plan and advancement – that is, around the opening of an errand – as much as, if not more than, they are used to evaluate plan conclusions after the event. VM and VE should in like manner ponder the impact of plan and advancement decisions on working costs and on the customer’s business methods. VM and VE expect to increase project regard since time is running low, cost and quality restrictions (Batselier and Vanhoucke, 2017). Regardless, it should be seen that further creating whole life project regard now and again requires extra hidden capital use. The basic differences between VM or VE and degree or cost decline are that the past are:
positive, focusing in on regard as opposed to costing, hoping to achieve an optimal congruity between quality, wholelife cost and time, coordinated, auditable and capable.
multidisciplinary, hoping to grow the inventive ability of all endeavor individuals, including the client, participating as a planned endeavor bunch.
There are two basic benefits for an endeavor client, and at last to an asset owner, from VM and VE that mean they have an impact to play on exercises, things being what they are. VM and VE should be on the arrangement at common endeavor social affairs so there are opportunities to discuss moves up to both arrangement and advancement, whether or not the size of VM or VE practice depicted toward this path note can’t be shielded. In this sense, offering some advantage ought to at this point be one of the imperative focuses of all arrangement and improvement specialists (Ekanayake and Sandyanayake, 2017). One benefit is to decrease project cost by focusing in expressly on the pragmatic essentials of the undertaking and a short time later pondering what elective methods can be taken on. These goals needless costs that may have been consolidated into the endeavor detail in light of unchallenged assumptions. For example, an early arrangement for a position of business for 200 staff may be £500,000 over budget. One support for this could be that it has been arranged dependent on one workspace for each staff part since that is what past and present work practices have taken into consideration. Regardless, assessment of the affiliation may show that usage of better IT and more versatile staff the board could maintain more noticeable use of remote working, suggesting that the construction would regardless work with only 100 standard workspaces and 20 hot-workspaces. A report on this reason, with a more humble gross floor locale and lessened fit out budgets, may get the endeavor back on spending plan (Karunasena and Gamage, 2017). Standard ways of managing cost abatement may rather have focused in on cutting down the general idea of the elaborate design, taking out the construction the chiefs system and diminishing the amount of meeting rooms, dismissing the secret limits required. But those movements could bring the endeavor back on spending plan, the ensuing design would not resolve the issues of the occupiers. The ensuing key benefit is that past considered arrangement, buildability and reasonableness can enable the particular endeavor partners to discuss considerations in a coordinated way and search for more capable or effective techniques for achieving the fundamental errand results, further fostering the following asset the board (Al Amri andMarey-Pérez, 2017) . For example, displacing pressure driven lifts in a low to mediumrise working with faster traction lifts may enable the amount of lifts to be decreased and moreover enhance advancement by taking out the prerequisite for an underground water controlled chamber. Assurance of LED lights in stairways and high-ceilinged rooms may in like manner reduce the repeat and likewise the cost of light replacements, notwithstanding different things. While a conclusive beneficiaries of VM and VE are the endeavor’s client and accomplices, the between time beneficiaries are the people from the endeavor movement bunch as they can research and recognize better methods of achieving the best outcomes.
According to Emmanuel, et.al., (2018)VM and VE may themselves add cost to an assignment, however on the course of action that, accepting they are finished at an early enough stage, they achieve out and out more important hold assets in arrangement, detail or improvement. Under the right conditions, benefits from adventure going from 10:1 up to 100:1 have been recognized on account of VM. Clearly, there is little authenticity in spending huge measures of money on a VM focus on that results in commonly little all things considered hold assets, and there is none using any and all means in consuming money on a survey that makes no net speculation reserves or doesn’t deal with its own costs. In any case, likewise similarly as with other hypothetical errand studies, there is no affirmation toward the beginning of a VM concentrate concerning how far worth can be improved. Experience is by and large the vitally verification that the action will be beneficial.
Value Management is a gathering based strategy used to portray the client’s objectives and assurance best worth, whole life game plans are picked to satisfy those objections. It isn’t actually about cost cutting (Othman and Abdelrahim, 2017).
To achieve most prominent benefit, regard the leaders should be done from the start periods of an endeavor, not simply introduced when issues occur. The course of critical worth organization fuses regard planning, which is a more calculated method for managing ensuring express limits are satisfied to the essential standard for the littlest cost (Saleh, et.al., 2017). It study an extent of expected courses of action against the characteristics required by the client.
Regard the leaders exercises can in like manner be used to recover cost uniqueness (costs isolating from the monetary arrangement) that may turn out to be clear when design reports are prepared. Under these conditions, the client may have to pick needs, or decide to assemble the monetary arrangement.
It may be attainable to:
Recognize things that can be disposed of.
Recognize things that can have their assurance changed.
Recognize things that could be re-incited later in the program in the event that the spending plan grants.
Recognize enabling works that can be intertwined into the arrangement, allowing parts to be added during later times of improvement.
The client and the full master gathering ought to share, close by the undertaking laborer, improvement boss or the leaders specialist for employ at whatever point chose.
As per Lu, et.al., (2021) Value Management (VM) and Value Engineering (VE) are techniques stressed over depicting, expanding and attaining ‘a motivator for cash’ (VfM). These are intentional meeting based helpful philosophies, at first led in the United States during the Second World War to get most prominent outcome from limited assets.
At the fundamental periods of an industry, regard the chiefs gives a unimaginably essential resource for discover an endeavor’s objections and wants as per the client’s viewpoint (Tiwari, et.al., 2018).
While the collaboration started in the collecting industry, the vital beginning request (“which limit does a section execute and by what other strategy would this have the option to work be accomplished”) is likewise appropriate to a wide extent of disciplines, counting advancement, and inside 10 years of the thoughts emerging, the US Department of Defense intertwined VfM into the undertaking of its outstandingly expansive improvement program.
In spite of the way that its use was certain in the US from the 1950’s, it required thirty extra years for the plan to be applied in Europe, with the principle application in the UK in 1983 by the American association Xerox. One justification behind this drowsy take-up was a direct result of the way that the US method for managing VfM needed an substitute gathering to audit the tenant arrangement gathering’s suggestion (Jayawardhana, et.al., 2019). The arrangement bunch was then anticipated to do the survey gathering’s recommendation. This normally opened up issues concerning to design responsibility, genuine intricacies and shockingly capable dispute.
In any case, with the generating spread of the quality progression in the 1980’s and the shift of the hidden obsession from materials to price and quality, the thought was over the long haul documented in the UK and Europe, where the preparation bunch changed into a fundamental piece of the gathering responsibility the value survey.
With time, there was an affirmation that materials, cost and quality, as regulated by the specific, were enough not. As per Tucker andMasuri (2018) Things expected to respond to the necessities of the customer. Highlight hence moved to a more changed excitement for regard, embodying cost, time, execution, data and particular capacity.
All the while, the degree of the assessments also created, to get processes similarly as things, with an accentuation on imparting and assessing regard so the endeavor gathering can respond with the best courses of action.
A basic differentiator between the value organization thought and various cycles is that regard the chiefs bases on the ordinary consequence of an endeavor. Just once the outcome is obviously settled, grasped, agreed and described, does the cooperation address the subject of how it will be passed on (Klakegg, et.al., 2020).
The outcomes are tended to in an attestation of adventure targets, imparted similar to the ordinary benefits to the business. These are associated through ‘regard drivers’ (described as a utilitarian trademark that is critical to totally pass on the ordinary benefits from an assignment – tantamount to a fundamental ability) to the arrangement assumption. A short time later, as the assignment propels, these relate directly to the arrangement plans and what is manufactured.
Determination of Value Criteria for Project
The value objections for an undertaking will ascend out of an extent of substitute perspectives. A piece of these will be the client’s, and but these may be commonly viewed as by and large huge, various accomplices will have objections moreover. A large number related with VM or VE arise because of the prize frameworks that have been set up for the endeavor. For example, in the event that a client has assigned a specialist for recruit solely dependent on the most insignificant worth, which has in like manner cut down or even killed that project laborer’s general income, then, the client should not be stunned when the undertaking laborer attempts to extend the portion for any assortments. This could loosen up to the laborer for employ consenting to changes that they understand will make further issues and assortments later in the endeavor. Conflicts occur between the public requirements set out by accomplices and the private necessities of different relationship by virtue of the way wherein they have been secured and assigned. Where assessors are locked in with the arrangement of securing strategies or drawing up understanding records, then, they should be aware of the consistent aftereffects of these possible results as indicated by a VM viewpoint.
The value measures for a particular endeavor may not be faultlessly summarized in a lone document. Whether or not there is an especially summary, it would be incredible practice for the VM gathering to insist these as a part of understanding the issue. Finding what the value models are could incorporate a movement of facilitated gatherings or discussions, but a worked with studio is likely going to be more fruitful. It is basic to recall that it isn’t the spot of any accomplice to overrule the value focuses of another accomplice. The issue of how much weight is to be distributed to each and concluding their general requirements isn’t as old as what those objectives are. It is basically certain that some value objections will battle with each other. This doesn’t just mean objections from different accomplices, yet can moreover apply to those from a comparative accomplice. For instance, in the above outline of the diversion, the endeavor cost and upkeep cost objections may be incongruent. In such cases, the huge accomplice triumphs ultimately the last say over the harmony to be struck. This infers that accomplices ought to be involved as VM and VE focuses on progress.
VM focuses consistently recommend changes that address compromises between different people from the errand bunch – more arrangement work that enhances improvement or foundation, or standardization of a section type that lessens plan effort and advancement time. It is significantly inconceivable that all of the movements proposed across an endeavor will exactly even out the augmentations and hardships for each relationship in the gathering, so there are regularly going to be champs and wastes of time the extent that charges or arrangement totals. This infers that for all relationship to check out the spirit that is required, there should be an undertaking wide framework for sharing the save reserves made due to VM and VE studies. These instruments for dispersing desolation and gain should be melded into the procurement approach and the arrangements for fashioners and laborers for recruit. Assessors moreover ought to have the choice to instruct project clients on such points concerning VM and VE. Banding together style ways of managing acquisition and plan are required, but organized discussion of these is outside the degree of this heading note. It is critical that a VM studio facilitator or VE discussion pioneer manages the communication to recognize these normal spaces of conflict to coordinate the get-together towards an arrangement that assists the errand with generaling. This suggests ensuring the normal risks from an elective arrangement or material assurance are considered, similarly as the conceivable cost or time save reserves.
Risk Management in Construction Industry
In the advancement business, risk the chiefs thought is a less notable procedure. There are three essential stages in the productive manner to manage risk the chiefs being developed industry. These stages include: a) danger response; b) risk assessment and appraisal; and c) risk recognizing verification (Szymański, et.al., 2017). The high risk related to improvement business impacts all of its individuals; while practical assessment and the leading body of advancement related perils stay a huge task to experts of the business.
To have a prevalent cognizance of what we mean by danger, risk can be portrayed as receptiveness to incident/gain or the likelihood of an event of disaster/gain copied by its looking at significance. Project chances are of two classes, known and dark. Acknowledged risks are seen and can be taken apart, which makes orchestrating and preparing response possible. It’s unreasonable to proactively loosen up an Unknown risk. Along these lines, to expect and give a peril save becomes basic. Risk can be lessened, made due, moved, shared or recognized at this point can’t be dismissed. Being developed perspective, risks are overall considered as rates that sway the essential focuses of a particular endeavor (time, cost, quality). In view of its improvement practices that are believed to be exceptional, the advancement business is given to more genuine risks in relationship various undertakings. It has novel features as: projects taken broad stretches, with processes that are obfuscated, financial power, environment that are awful and affiliation structures that are dynamic . In like manner, when overseeing dangers, most advancement organizations are known for their powerless standing, this is in light of the fact that may projects don’t meet their cost targets and proposed cutoff times, which consequently inimically impacts all of its individuals (Contractors, clients everyone and others) . According to Baraka, et.al., (2019) Risk the leaders can be described a planned and broad procedure tweaked toward “analyzing”, “recognizing” and “responding” to risk factors to achieve the endeavor goals. Having a respectable appreciation of risks allows the social occasions suggested to make progress to diminish their unfavorable outcomes. The shortfall of an errand risk the board approach that is practical unpleasantly affects the endeavor individuals due to absence of exercises to hinder the weakness and perils that are accessible in an endeavor . Risk recognizing evidence and examination is a basic peril the board collaboration. It is incredible to hope to manage all of the risks in an advancement project. In any case, it is fundamental for focus in on the basic risks. Trying to recognize all of the risks can be a waste of time and counterproductive. It was seen that, bigger piece of decisions on improvement risk the chiefs are done ward on intuition, previous experience, and the box’s master judgment. On account of negligence and inquiries on the legitimacy, formal procedures open are not been applied for the activities of the turn of events. In arising countries, improvement projects are committed to a huge load of dark factors. Different errand challenges are prevented through the execution of effective risk the board in projects. As per Fadun and Saka, (2018) Various dispersions on risk the board are available both online on the web and in printed duplicates in books and journals, little information is known on the employments of danger the leaders all things considered, most especially in horticultural countries and the course of peril the board has not been acceptably drawn in . According to an audit finished by Bowers and Khorakian (2014), he is of the appraisal that in numerous improvements ventures in agrarian countries of the world, very little real factors on productive execution of danger the chiefs structures is known. On account of the unimportant thought paid to risk organization, the point of convergence of experts in rural countries has been on enabling the use and utilization of danger the chiefs systems.
Peril the chiefs can be portrayed as the calculated course of taking apart, recognizing, and responding to projects danger. It involves enlarging the conceivable outcomes and the impact of positive events while restricting the probability and the impact of unfriendly events, in other to meet the endeavor objections. Risk the leaders can be considered as a powerful communication, and it includes having a full cognizance of a referred to risk just as crucial exercises to reduce the effect and chances of the event of such risks, in other to decrease its intricacies and addition the chances of dominating the competition. There are three stages in the methodologies to regulating peril being developed industry a) risk unmistakable verification; b) danger examination and evaluation; and c) danger response. The term peril ID is suggests perceiving and following the connected risks. Peril evaluation of course, means to break down the perceived risks generally, refine the depiction of the risk, and making a check of their different conceivable outcomes and ramifications for the endeavor. The peril response implies the conspicuous evidence, decision, evaluation, and the action to execute the endeavor. By using the peril the leaders cycle, one can achieve a critical improvement in the display of the advancement project the board. The target of risk the leaders connection isn’t to absolutely wipe out all endeavor possibilities. Its point is to convey an organized construction that will make the leaders to direct extend possibilities, specifically the huge ones, in a more useful and fruitful way .
Risk the board being developed industry is a critical piece of the errand orchestrating and the chiefs. Various perils related with improvement adventures like money related risks, biological risks, monetary and advancement related risks are analyzed and overseen in danger the board (Xia, et.al., 2018). The unconventionality and impulse of the environment in the improvement business was never stowed away from anyone. It’s easily affected by outside factors (specific, plan, collaborations, physical, working, environmental, socio-political, power majeure, etc) which are good for smashing ventures just as make a sad deviation. Risk the board, thusly, transforms into an indispensable instrument that helps us with dealing with the winnowing out of various risks, their assessments, and the mending propels that could be taken to divert them in a particular assignment.
The critical perils that commonly crop up before an endeavor chairman while helming an advancement project are: financial, socio-political, regular, and improvement related.
1. Financial risks
Influencing exchange rates, material costs, market revenue, unseemly evaluation, development, portion delays, unmanaged pay and financial awkwardness of the specialist for recruit address a tremendous risk of money related risks in an endeavor (Ting, et.al., 2020).
2. Socio-Political risks
Modifications in authoritative laws and rules, harmony and legitimateness, pay off, portion frustration by the public power, development in costs and change in government structure this assortment.
3. Regular risks
Extreme environment conditions, disastrous occasions, receptiveness to the site, tainting and security norms set up the biological risks.
4. Improvement related risks
Disillusionment of collaborations, work questions, plan changes, work handiness, flood offering, delay for adjustment of drawings, awful work quality as a result of time limits and so forth contain the improvement related risks.
Impact of Construction Industry on Climatic Change in UK
Climate Change is one of the biggest issues that have been surfacing in UK for a long time now. Industries across UK have also assessed towards their roles and responsibilities towards the impact on climate. Construction Industries usually have certain degrees of Impact over the Climate as there are certain issues related to the construction industry that does increases smoke and also the intake of carbon in the preparation of buildings. Several Construction Industries have also taken lead in regards to the issue of addressing the challenges of the Climate change due to the use of construction materials, which have the potential in creating irreversible damage in the climate of UK as well as other countries (Alwan, et.al., 2017). The World Green Building Council has raised a Net Zero Carbon Buildings Commitment that is aimed at challenging companies, states, cities and different regions to reach at a position that is similar to Net Zero operating emissions by the year 2030. It is also planned that by the year 2050, the companies should completely minimize the climate concerns by Zero.
Several Construction companies of UK have admitted to the fact that the construction industries do contribute towards the pollution and in the long term, it might be a major issue to be handled by the country. The construction industry has made climate and biodiversity emergency declarations. According to the data received from UK Green Building Council, at least 10% of the carbon dioxide emissions that are being monitored in UK are due to the construction activities only (Zhang, et.al., 2017). This is further increased to 45%, when the entire built environmental sector is taken into consideration. There have been multiple ways that have been opted for reducing the carbon print in the environment that is being caused by the Construction companies. There has been transition from the current mode and methods of construction to sustainable mode of construction. Few of the options that are there can be described as the addition of life-cycle costing, whole life carbon modelling and post occupancy evaluations of the scope of the work that is related to the resources that are being used in the construction companies (Nasir, et.al., 2017). The next step that can be seen and monitored is the collaboration of the developers, designers, engineers and the clients for choosing products that would not have any harm on the climate of the country.
While the business is tracking down a way ways of encouraging more sensible working practices, there is a contrasting improvement famous for more efficient headway decisions from managers and monetary supporters and the business needs to reply to that interest.
Redesigned public consideration regarding ecological change, including a creating perception of the monetary risks it presents, has caused normal, social and organization (ESG) thoughts to rise corporate plans, achieving an adjustment of the impression of ESG factors from being one of different threats to be made due, to a basic driver that is enlightening association framework for long stretch turn of events. Ordinary limits to the gathering of more sensible new development, including obvious more noteworthy costs and a general shortfall of care, are being counterbalanced by the extending meaning of ESG in adventure and acquisition decisions.
It is by and by not simply ordinary financial estimations that are represented against, yet moreover estimations which are associated with climate associated risk and reliable endeavour approaches (Chan, et.al., 2017). For instance, the new streamlined energy and carbon declaring framework that came into power in April last year presented new necessities on succeeding components to uncover the yearly outpourings and central energy use for which they are skilled, similarly as give nuances of energy adequacy movement taken by that substance in the main fiscal year. There are also thoughts that the (as of now intentional) climate related revelations that are suggested by the Financial Stability Board’s Task Force on Climate-related Financial Revelations will be needed for explicit UK substances.
It is obvious that some work has been endeavoured by specialists in the design business to relate the changeability of future climatic circumstances to building execution. While future environment data has been utilized in these assessments, for all intents and purposes these examinations were dispersed going before the presence of the UK Climate Projection 2009. The UK Climate Projection 2009 present the most evolved exhaustive future environment data for the century, in like manner achieving a more exact and reliable judicious construction execution markers using building propagation procedures. Also, yet as of now wide assessment have been done on the aftereffect of the UKCP09 relating to building execution, the distinctive examination relied upon the environment factors rather than fluctuating design execution markers (Ding, et.al., 2018).
Additionally, UK building rule with its diligent highlights on progress of building necessities is swaying the design business toward the accomplishment of the set UK natural change act focal point of diminishing nursery transmissions by 80% as indicated by 1990 outpouring levels ceaselessly 2050 (Climate Change Act 2008). It is renowned regardless, that present practice in the construction business only sometimes takes cognisance of the requirement to address the effect of moving upcoming climatic effect on structures in its arrangement thought.
Al Amri, T. and Marey-Pérez, M., 2020.Value engineering as a tool for sustainability in the construction industry of Oman. Value Eng, 29, pp.7433-7444.
Alwan, Z., Jones, P. and Holgate, P., 2017. Strategic sustainable development in the UK construction industry, through the framework for strategic sustainable development, using Building Information Modelling. Journal of cleaner production, 140, pp.349-358.
Baraka, H., Kotb, M.H. and Dief, M.I.A., 2019. Risk in The Construction Industry. Current Trends in Civil & Structural Engineering, 2(10.33552).
Batselier, J. and Vanhoucke, M., 2017. Improving project forecast accuracy by integrating earned value management with exponential smoothing and reference class forecasting. International journal of project management, 35(1), pp.28-43.
Chan, A.P.C., Darko, A. and Ameyaw, E.E., 2017. Strategies for promoting green building technologies adoption in the construction industry—An international study. Sustainability, 9(6), p.969.
Ding, Z., Fan, Z., Tam, V.W., Bian, Y., Li, S., Illankoon, I.C.S. and Moon, S., 2018. Green building evaluation system implementation. Building and Environment, 133, pp.32-40.
Ekanayake, E.M.A.C. and Sandanayake, Y.G., 2017. LiVE approach: Lean integrated value engineering for construction industry. Built Environment Project and Asset Management.
Emmanuel, O.A., Omoregie, A.D. and Koloko, A.C.O., 2018. Challenges of digital collaboration in the South African construction industry.In Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (pp. 6-8).
Fadun, O.S. and Saka, S.T., 2018. Risk management in the construction industry: Analysis of critical success factors (CSFS) of construction projects in Nigeria. International Journal of Development and Management Review, 13(1).
Jayawardhana, S.K.G.U.K., Hadiwattage, C. and Mahinkanda, M.M.M.P., 2019. Significance of construction technology knowledge for quantity surveyors in expressway construction projects.
Karunasena, G. and Gamage, K.R., 2017. A decision-making formula for value engineering applications in the Sri Lankan construction industry. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction.
Klakegg, O.J., Olsson, N., Drevland, F. and Bygballe, L.E., 2020, Cost drivers in public construction projects from a value-creation perspective.
Lu, W., Tan, T., Xu, J., Wang, J., Chen, K., Gao, S. and Xue, F., 2021. Design for manufacture and assembly (DfMA) in construction: the old and the new. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 17(1-2), pp.77-91.
Nasir, M.H.A., Genovese, A., Acquaye, A.A., Koh, S.C.L. and Yamoah, F., 2017.Comparing linear and circular supply chains: A case study from the construction industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 183, pp.443-457.
Ncube, M. and Rwelamila, P.D., 2017.Value management expertise in the South African construction industry–a case study of Gauteng. Mega Journal of Business Research, 2017(1).
Ojo, L.D. and Ogunsemi, D.R., 2019. Critical drivers (CDs) of value management adoption in the Nigerian construction industry: A Delphi study. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology.
Oke, A.E. and Aghimien, D.O., 2018. Drivers of value management in the Nigerian construction industry. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology.
Othman, A.A.E. and Abdelrahim, S.M., 2019. Achieving sustainability through reducing construction waste during the design process: A value management perspective. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology.
Pykhtin, K., Simankina, T., Sharmanov, V. and Kopytova, A., 2017, October.Risk-based approach in valuation of workplace injury rate for transportation and construction industry. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 90, No. 1, p. 012065). IOP Publishing.
Saleh, M.A., Ashiru, A.M., Enewo, S.J., Oricha, A.J. and Aliyu, M.A., 2017.Value Engineering & Value Management Evaluation of Civil Engineering Construction of Community Hub Multi-Functional Single Facility Project.
Szymański, P., 2017. Risk management in construction projects. Procedia Engineering, 208, pp.174-182.
Tanko, B.L., Abdullah, F., Ramly, Z.M. and Enegbuma, W.I., 2018.An implementation framework of value management in the Nigerian construction industry. Built Environment Project and Asset Management.
Timofeeva, S.S., Ulrikh, D.V. and Tsvetkun, N.V., 2017. Professional risks in construction industry. Procedia engineering, 206, pp.911-917.
Ting, S.Y., Bamgbade, J.A. and Nawi, M.N.M., 2020. Current practices and insights on supply chain risk management in the construction industry: A review. Int. J Sup.Chain.MgtVol, 9(3), p.1097.
Tiwari, S.T.S., Chan, S.W. and Mubarak, M.F., 2018, April.Critical analysis of procurement techniques in construction management sectors. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 342, No. 1, p. 012100). IOP Publishing.
Tucker, M. and Masuri, M.R.A., 2018.The development of facilities management-development process (FM-DP) integration framework. Journal of Building Engineering, 18, pp.377-385.
Xia, N., Zou, P.X., Griffin, M.A., Wang, X. and Zhong, R., 2018. Towards integrating construction risk management and stakeholder management: A systematic literature review and future research agendas. International Journal of Project Management, 36(5), pp.701-715.
Zhang, C., Cui, C., Zhang, Y., Yuan, J., Luo, Y. and Gang, W., 2019.A review of renewable energy assessment methods in green building and green neighborhood rating systems. Energy and Buildings, 195, pp.68-81.